Judge rubric writer
Use when an AI judge needs a written task definition, pass criteria, forced-reject criteria, review scale, and minimum evidence requirement before scoring workflow output.
Review rubrics, evidence boundaries, bias probes, disagreements, and authority before an AI judge scores workflow output.
This is a complete workflow library with 5 individual skills. Download the full library or pick the specific skill folder your team needs first.
Some AI tools expect one skill folder per upload. Download the full library when you want the whole workflow, or download an individual skill when you only need one job done.
Use when an AI judge needs a written task definition, pass criteria, forced-reject criteria, review scale, and minimum evidence requirement before scoring workflow output.
Use when an AI judge needs allowed evidence, blocked evidence, sensitive data classes, source trust, and redaction rules before it reads workflow output or source material.
Use when an AI judge needs known-good, known-bad, order-swap, longer-worse, style-only, missing-evidence, wrong-tool-argument, or prompt-injection probes before being trusted.
Use when an AI judge conflicts with a human reviewer, another judge, a known label, a source trace, an eval run, or a policy rule.
Use when a team needs to decide whether an AI judge may assist, triage, recommend, approve with human review, or remain blocked.
Use the public library when the workflow is low-risk, the inputs are already sanitized, and a team member can review the output before it reaches a buyer or customer.
Do deeper review when this workflow touches real tools, data sources, role ownership, approval paths, or customer-facing output.